mermaidcamp

mermaidcamp

Keeping current in wellness, in and out of the water

You can scroll the shelf using and keys

Sylvester Graham and His Crackers

February 2, 2014 2 Comments

The son of an older Presbyterian minister and his much younger wife, Sylvester Graham became an orphan early in his life.  His mother was committed to an insane asylum and his father died.  He was admitted to Amherst, but left without graduating.  He met the Reverend William Metcalf, founder of the first vegetarian church in Philadelphia, known as The Bible Christians. He was convinced to try vegetarianism and soon pronounced it to be the remedy for alcoholism. Graham was a crusader for the use of whole grains.  He was outraged that beer and distilled spirits were using grains to create alcohol rather than whole grain foods.  He was angry with bakers for using what was known as the “bolting cloth” a process that removed the bran from the flour.  In 1837 he called physicians vampires in lectures given to his followers in Boston.  He denounced the butchers and the bakers of the city, causing a revolt on the part of the aforementioned.

Today we know his name because the graham cracker is part of our American cuisine.  The corn flake and other whole grain cereals followed the lead of Graham crackers.  He became an ordained Presbyterian minister and an ardent opponent of the consumption of both alcohol and flesh.  Since legal prohibition had been repealed in 1933 his views on alcohol were out of step with the times, and certainly nobody wanted to hear him go off on vegetarian diet when it was more unpopular.  His hatred for the “bolting cloth” moved him to call it America’s shroud.  Now that so many suffer from saccharine disease, his extreme beliefs that the removal of bran may seem prophetic.  What is crazy is that the Graham cracker of today contains no whole grain.  Unbleached white flour and sugar are the tasty main ingredient in our key lime pie crust, which would have made Sylvester freak out all over the place.

Pilgrims, Puritans, and Politics

November 6, 2012 2 Comments

Alice Carpenter, Pilgrim

There is some gross generalization presented in the Thanksgiving spectacle/history lesson of the colonies. There was turkey, lots of lobster, and headgear similar to the hats and feathers in school pageants, but the Pilgrims and the Puritans are not the same group of people.  If one traces carefully the two thought forms still exist in America, but they are distinct.  Pilgrims came from Holland on the Mayflower to bring their biblical faith to another part of the earth.  They believed they were sojourners on the earth destined for the holy city, and only subject to worldly law when it did not conflict with religious directives.  The Puritans, as the name implies, had been working in reformation to purify religion through political action.  Puritans arrived after the Pilgrims in the Boston area. They had a different attitude toward the native people, since they were not sharing a divine sojourn with them, but making a political state that they believed aligned with pure reformation ideals.  Both groups shared biblical Christianity as their standard, but in practice Pilgrims sought peace while Puritans sought to dominate through harsh purifying authority  (think Salem/witches). None of this would have ever been done if the Bible had not been printed, causing  Europe to become politically violent about reforming, restoring, separating, and purifying. Before printing presses political power and religious power were so obviously entwined as to cause…the Reformation.

Thomas Southworth was born a Pilgrim  in Holland.  His father died there. His mother, Alice Carpenter , sailed from Leiden on the Mayflower with her second husband, Gov. William Bradford.  After Plymouth was established as a Pilgrim colony Thomas joined his mother and stepfather.  William Bradford was a shoe merchant, and many other Mayflower Pilgrims were also in clothing, hat, and fashion trades.  They had spent years in Holland being influenced by the fancy colorful costuming of the Dutch.  It was politically not cool to starch your ruffs (ruffles like QE I wore up around the neck).  The large collar draped rather than stiff said you were so New World 1620. That explains the white scarf look we see in costumes.  Almost no real Pilgrim clothing remains from the period, so the current stereotype is not accurate.  Black and grey may have been worn, but were not standard.  These Pilgrims were fashionable religious adventurers (with stylin’ footwear) bonding with the natives in the new commune/colony  of Plymouth when the Puritans arrived.  Thomas spent his career as a (well dressed, I am sure ) politician.

Thomas Southworth (1617 – 1669)
is my 10th great grandfather
Daughter of Thomas
Daughter of Elizabeth
Son of Elizabeth
Daughter of Eleazer
Daughter of Sarah
Daughter of Mercy
Son of Martha
Son of Abner
Son of Daniel Rowland
Son of Jason A
Son of Ernest Abner
is the daughter of Richard Arden
This year if you think about Pilgrims, or use little figures decoratively get something historically correct.  There was no water on the Mayflower.  Every man woman and child was issued beer each day of the trip.  Imagine the hangover a child might get from a long sea voyage drinking nothing but beer.  As sojourners of the earth they felt it was all part of the mission.  Get over the concept that these people (Pilgrims)  sailed across the sea to wear black and stuff turkeys.  They came here to tune in, turn on, and drop out of the religious struggles in the old country. They were all about debunking the folly of corrupt authority posing as religion.  Pilgrims were the big proponents of separation of church and state.  They believed  that they had a personal connection to providence that was more important and powerful than any civil institution. Puritans, on the other hand, had interest in reforming civil institutions. Can you link these beliefs to today’s political landscape?